And the Oscar Goes to…
So it’s my favorite night of the year and it’s coming to an end. For me at least, for all those fools that won some big award it’s only just begun. That’s right, on my way home from my friend’s house, I passed many men and women in fancy attire sliding glamorously out of black SUVs. I said it last year, and I’ll say it again, it’s the weirdest thing to live in L.A. on Oscar Night. Really it’s the weirdest thing to live in Hollywood.
Ding Dong the Strike is Done!
t’s finally over. It only cost the city of Los Angeles $2 Billion. And yes, the strike is done. Everybody is going back to work, though, due to loss of funds, I gather not everybody is going back to work yet. Also, I gather that many shows won’t be going back to work until July or August. The negotiations finally came to a head about a week ago and the writers got a little more money and the producers got a bit of what they wanted…it was like a real life union meeting where things get done. Now we just have to worry about the Actors who may very well go on strike in June (though they are already in negotiations). We shall see, but until then, my favorite day of the year is on Sunday. Sure, awards season has been ruined for the most part, but Sunday is the Oscars. Hollywood Blvd. is shut down between Highland and La Brea, the red carpet is being laid out as we speak, the bleachers are up already. And I have Sunday evening off.
The Future has a way of Arriving Unannouced.
So I’ve been avoiding this topic seeing as it’s all sort of up in the air right now, but it has been eating at my brain and I’ve just got to get it out. The topic is, of course, Oscars. Now I really don’t know what’s going on with the Oscars, as far as I’ve heard right now they are on. I know the Academy is trying to barter with the writers to let them happen without a hitch, if this doesn’t work, the Screen Actors Guild will not attend. That means that there will be no movie stars at the Oscars. They will still happen and be broadcast, but the presenters will basically be studio big wigs (a.k.a. the ugly people who no one wants to see, but who are in charge of getting movies made). That’s what I know so far and no, there is no end in sight to the strike.
Los Angeles Caucus
Ah, it’s election time again. Time for the ceaseless advertisements in newspapers, on television, on huge billboards all over the city. That’s right folks, it’s election time in L.A.
Oh wait, you thought I was talking politics. No no, we don’t really like politics in L.A. Sure we pretend to care. We go out and buy hybrid Lexus SUVs when Al Gore tells us to. We love what excellent stories are coming out of the cocked up Bush Administration (wait until he’s gone, there will be 8 trillion movies about what a fucking disaster that was). But really, here in L.A., we could give a fuck about politics. We don’t care about Iowa or New Hampshire because right now we’re having our own election coverage. It’s awards season and it’s time to vote. Now, it’s been a year since my last golden globe/oscar recaps and I still have yet to be allowed into the vote…patience dear friends, patience. However, living in L.A. means I’m inundated with advertisements telling me how fucking fantastic every single film that is out right now is. I’m pretty sure Juno, No Country For Old Men, There Will Be Blood, Atonement, Charlie Wilson’s War, and Sweeney Todd are all the best movies of the year, as stated by every movie reviewer that has ever lived.
I never quite got how reviewers call every movie the best movie of the year. Do you just not have discerning taste because I can pick which one I liked the best and I’ve seen all of them? Is it the campaign funds? Are the studios paying the critics (they’re certainly not paying the writers) to call every movie the best movie of the year (even the ones that are unbearable)? What is up with that?
In my opinion there was only one best movie of the year and it was Juno, but I also know how people in Hollywood feel about comedies (the same way people in Washington feel about Hilary): How nice that it’s there, now we’re going to give this award to something that’s a little different (read: No Country for Old Men and Barack).
Now, like our Presidential races, we in Hollywood are having some set backs and some uncharted territory. You might be aware that there’s a writers strike going on. In fact, you might be aware that your favorite television shows are done, if not they’ve only got one or two episodes left. I know, I know, you’re devastated that you won’t see what’s happening on House for the rest of the year…that’s right, they’re not coming back until next season and even then, we might be behind. But what you may not know is that this is going to affect the awards shows. I’m completely heartbroken. Basically, the WGA agreed not to picket the Golden Globes if NBC didn’t air it on National Television. NBC said that it has the right to film the Golden Globes and if they go on, they will film it and put it on T.V. As of right now, the Golden Globes are set to go on. What the hell does this mean? It means that there will be a bunch of nobodies at the Golden Globes (I’m expecting my invitation any day…this might be the only year I get to go). All the actors, who are in sympathy with the writers, will not be attending. Plus, they can’t write anything for the Globes because they can’t use WGA writers. So basically it will go something like this. The nominees for best picture drama are __________________. And the Globe goes to ____________________. How thrilling. The oscars will be the same way. I’m trying to make it through this hard time but it hurts me deeply.
So yes, it could be that there is no Christmas for Julia this year. No speeches that make me cry. No watching Diablo Cody say something awesome about being a stripper in Minnesota (cold, don’t try it is what I gather) and winning an Academy Award (pretty sure she’ll be the first in history). But perhaps the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will make some sort of deal with the WGA and be able to show the Oscars. If Letterman did it, then the Academy should be able to, right? I’m grasping for straws. Shit.
Okay, well, I guess I’ll get to it. Julia’s 2007 Award predictions:
Best Original Screenplay:
Diablo Cody for Juno
Best Adapted Screenplay:
Joel and Ethan Coen for No Country for Old Men
Best Director:
Joel and Ethan Coen for No Country for Old Men, or
Tim Burton for Sweeny Todd
(neither of these folks has an Oscar or a Globe for this so I’m thinking it’s one or the others year)
Best Supporting Actor
Javier Bardem for No Country for Old Men, though I could see an upset as
Casey Affleck for The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (he was absolutely amazing in it).
Best Supporting Actress
There aren’t many stellar performances this year. I could see it going to
Saoirse Ronan for Atonement but I could also see it going to a big hitter like
Cate Blanchett for I’m Not There or
Julia Roberts for Charlie Wilson’s War
Best Actor
It’s a toss up between
Daniel Day-Lewis for There Will Be Blood (he’s so good, it’s unreal), but it could be the year that the Academy finally pulls it’s head out of it’s ass and gives it to
Johnny Depp for Sweeney Todd…they do love giving awards to musicals (hello Catherine Zeta-Jones, Reese Witherspoon, Jennifer Hudson, etc)
Best Actress
This is actually one of the hardest to call. In my opinion they should throw it at
Marion Cotillard for La Vie En Rose. No words can describe how good she is. However, I could see the Academy giving it to
Kiera Knightly for Atonement to try and solidify her as a true leading lady (too bad she can’t seem to shake the period pieces). I could also see them throwing it to
Angelina Jolie for A Mighty Heart because America has forgotten that she already has a fucking award and she sure as hell doesn’t deserve one for this movie, but it’s a political thing…who says we don’t care about politics? Oh wait, me
I could also see
Ellen Page for Juno upsetting this race. I personally would be happy but Marion deserves it by far. It’s just I don’t know if the Academy is going to give it to a French lady in a foreign movie (that’s only happened like two times, Roberto Benigni and someone else).
And last but not least,
Best Picture
This is hard to call. Personally I think it will be
No Country for Old Men, but I could see
There Will Be Blood taking it.
I could see Juno upsetting, but I doubt it. Also, I could see
Sweeney Todd upsetting, but I doubt it.
This race is down to No Country and There Will be Blood.
Personally I think No Country was the better of the two, but I could see either one taking it.
Alright kids, well, until next time, Barack the Vote.
Peace, Love, and Happy Campaigning,
Julia
No Country for Bad Taste.
So I saw No Country for Old Men last night for the second time. As before, it was fantastic, but this time I saw it with a bunch of people. Now, I get that people have different tastes in film, in art, etc, but I respect some of those differences and (if we’re going to be honest) I judge for some of those differences. That’s right. Now I don’t judge on the big things, but I’ll tell you the truth. If someone thinks a film like American Beauty is a piece of crap, I lose some respect. There are very few things that are like this, but recently I’ve found a new one. It’s No Country for Old Men.I get that it’s not a typical film. But that’s really what makes it so awesome. It’s really not a typical Coen Brothers film, and even though I love the Coen Brothers, that’s another thing that makes the movie so awesome.
So here’s the real deal. A bunch of the people I saw the movie with said ‘what’s the point?’ No Country doesn’t really make it’s point like most movies do. I mean, the underlying theme of the film is really truly underlying. And everyone sort of zones out during Tommy Lee Jones’ final speech because they don’t know it’s his final speech, but that is where the whole point of the movie is. I mean, it’s a movie about how an older generation becomes obsolete. Yeah, it’s not happy. Yeah, it’s almost taboo. But you know what, like American Beauty, it’s a film that outlines an inherent truth, that at a certain point (this was even more true for Vietnam Vets in the ’80s) the older ways of functioning within a particular area of society out grow the older members of that same social demographic.
I think why I take such offense to people who don’t like the film is that, much like the book, which was also amazingly brilliant, the point is not splayed out, not spoon fed. You don’t know much about the characters, just that they’re interesting, and you want to know more. You don’t know who the real villains are, just that they are omnipresent. I love that you have to work for the film to make sense.
Don’t get me wrong, I love a good fun movie. I mean, you all know that my favorite movie is Clueless. On the other hand, I also like when I have to work a little bit for a movie. You know, like when art actually makes you think…I mean, isn’t that kind of the point?
I have to say the other reason I get really peeved is that many of the people that hated this movie are the ones that say they don’t want movies that are too realistic. I mean, why do you need to see real life on screen, isn’t real life depressing enough? I don’t know, I really don’t know what to think about that. I really don’t know how to react to that kind of logic. I mean, that’s like saying that the Mona Lisa should have never been painted, the statue of David never been made because we all know what real people look like. And I’m sorry that’s just not a good argument. I get that there are times for the realistic movies and times for the fantasy. And as I have said before I’m a big fan of romantic comedies, which are complete fantasy. I also see the importance of art being honest and real.
So here’s the deal. See the movie, like, don’t like, just don’t tell me there’s not a point to it. And do me a favor. Read the book and see what an amazing adaptation the film is. Then watch as the Coen Brothers win Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Director, and Best Picture…and watch Javier Bardem win Best Actor.
Peace, Love, and Chigurh,
Julia
Ballad of Clarence and Alabama
Okay,
So a while ago I started the big countdown of my favorite movies, and,
in true Julia fashion, I managed to get sidetracked. So here goes,
this is my third favorite movie of all time, and yes they are in
order. And just in case you forgot, as I often do, number five was
Reality Bites, number four was Say Anything, and number three is True
Romance. So I know I’ve talked about this one before, so again, I’ll
try not to be too repetitive, and this one will be short and sweet
because really the top 2.5 are the real juicy ones that I have lots
and lots to talk about.
Alrighty then, so True Romance, here we go. Like I said before, it’s
the best Tarantino movie there is, specifically for the reason that
it’s directed by Tony Scott (Ridley Scott’s brother). When Tarantino
wrote the original script it was truly Tarantinoesque. It was all
non-linear and Christian Slater died at the end. I mean, I’m sure it
would have worked but not as well…it would have been a completely
different movie. And one that I may or may not have wanted to see.
Now, something that I don’t know that I’ve ever explicitly said
outright is that a great movie is all about great casting. Most
people don’t really realize how much casting really makes a film.
Think of ‘When Harry met Sally’ without Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan.
Now think about it without Bruno Kirby and Carrie Fisher (the
supporting cast). It’s not just about the leads. I mean, let’s learn
something from Girl, Interrupted (a.k.a. the movie Angelina Jolie
stole from Winona Ryder). What good is Scarlett O’Hara without Rhett
Butler, Ashley, Melanie, Mammy, and the rest of them. I mean, the
supporting cast is just as important, if not more so than the leading
men and leading ladies.
This is the genius of movies like the Big Lebowski and True Romance.
Sure, in True Romance the movie rests on the chemistry between
Patricia Arquette and Christian Slater. I mean, without us, the
audience, buying them as a couple, and buying them falling in love as
fast as they do, the whole movie doesn’t work. But
True Romance wouldn’t be nearly as good as it is without the
supporting cast. Just starting with Val Kilmer as Elvis, who we never
really see, he’s always sort of in the background, in the distance, as
Clarence’s conscious. Then, of course, and I promise not to wax too
poetic about him, there’s Gary Oldman as Drexl, the white guy who
thinks he’s a black guy pimp.
Then there’s Dennis Hopper as Clarence’s dad. And Christopher Walken
as the Mafioso who’s after Clarence. The two of them engage in one of
the best tense conversation moments…in a scene of true Tarantino
genius Denis Hopper tells Christopher Walken about how Sicilians are
descended from black people (he uses a different word, that I’m not
comfortable with). What is amazing about the scene is how difficult
it is to tear your eyes away from the screen. The two of them are
laughing as the story is told, but there’s just so much going on
underneath, and you know that Christopher Walken is going to do
something violent because of this story, and you can see it coming,
but you can see that they truly respect each other. It’s great.
Then of course there’s Balki, yes, that’s right, Bronson Pinchot from
perfect strangers as the assistant to producer Lee Donowitz. He plays
a perfect assistant, just pretentious enough. He’s not as good as
Adam Brody in Thank You For Smoking (that’s what career assistants are
really like), but he’s pretty rad.
Of course the true real greatness, and stand out supporting actor is
Brad Pitt. I still maintain that this is his best role, even though
he’s not in it very much. He plays Michael Rapaport’s stoner
roommate. I just don’t know if words can describe the brilliance of
Brad Pitt’s performance as Floyd. The best line is when James
Gandolfini walks in and asks about Clarence’s whereabouts. When he
leaves Brad Pitt, in his stoner voice says, ‘don’t condensend me man.
I’ll fucking kill you.’ It’s brilliant, and I assure you, there are
no spelling errors in that quote.
This brings me to the man, James Gandolfini, who, surprise surprise,
plays a mobster…in training for Tony Soprano perhaps. Anyway, he is
a badass in this movie, as he was in the Sopranos. And it’s all
realized in the scene between him and Patricia Arquette…the infamous
fight scene with the infamous corkscrew. Usually I’m not one for
watching male female physical fights. I mean, I don’t really like
watching men and women beat each other up, but I have to say, it’s
supremely satisfying in True Romance…probably due to the outcome of
the fight.
Still, the corkscrew is priceless.
Now, this movie does come with a disclaimer since I have heard from
some people that you are actually watching these movies…which
couldn’t make me happier. But this is a Quentin Tarantino movie and
you know what that means…violence and STRONG language, and this is
me talking. So just a warning.
There are other things that make True Romance my third favorite movie,
but I’m pretty sure I’ve covered them so go back and look at your old
emails if you need some more persuasion. And until next time…
Peace, Love, and Alabama Whirley,
Julia
I’m The Dude…So That’s What You Call Me.
Ok, so I promised a three part series on my favorite T.V. shows and
don’t worry they’re coming. But I just finished watching Fargo for
the first time since it came to Video (yes, Video) and I just have to
talk about the Cohen Brothers, and what fucking genius’ they are.
Now, when it comes to film I’m not a snob. I, much like Roger Ebert,
judge films on what they are. I’m never going to compare Legally
Blonde to Taxi Driver. Apples and Oranges people. You just have take
films for what they are and what they are trying to achieve. Legally
Blonde is a great movie (I can hear my mother groaning from 400 miles
away) and Taxi Driver is a great movie. Sure, one of them is Oscar
worthy, but they are both awesome movies. And you know what? I don’t
always want to watch an oscar-worthy film. I don’t always want to
watch Taxi Driver.
That being said, The Cohen Brothers appeal to each one of these
sensibilities. When I need a serious film I, from now on, can turn to
Fargo. Fargo is just one of those movies where everthing is perfect.
I mean the script (oscar winning I may add) is amazing, but really the
actors are what brings this movie up to what it is. I watched the
special features on this movie and one of the actors says that it’s
just a movie about ordinary people trying to live ordinary lives. And
Bill Macy is just brilliant at this. He’s just trying to make money
for his family and trying to deal with his ass of a father-in-law. He
makes some bad decisions along the way, but when it comes down to it
he’s just an ordinary man trying to live and ordinary life.
The best performance is by Frances MacDormand. She’s just doing her
job. She’s good at her job, but she’s just figuring out this crime.
When it’s over, she’ll move to the next one.
The supporting cast, headed by Steve Buscemi among others, fill out
the texture of the story fabulously.
It’s just a great film.
The Cohen Brothers fill out the sort of quirky, wacky comedy through
two different films. Raising Arizona was the first. Nick Cage and
Holly Hunter are just hilarious. I mean, they want to be parents so
they steal a baby. Nick’s wacky friends played by Steve Buscemi and
John Goodman are excellent comic relief and overall the film is one
that you can watch over and over.
But the Piece de la Resistance is by far The Big Lebowski (where the
subject title is from). Okay, so I’m a little biased because my
father is The Dude. I can just imagine him shopping for milk (for his
white russians) in a bathrobe. The Big Lebowski is Film Noir turned
on its head. It’s a mystery, missing person hunt, you don’t know who
works for whom, who’s good, who’s bad, but instead of Philip Marlowe
or Sam Spade we have Jeff Bridges’ The Dude and John Goodman’s Walter.
They’re the best onscreen duo, onscreen married couple in the history
of movies.
The Big Lebowski, if you are unaware, is somewhat of a cult hit. If
you have kids or friends in college, or know people in college, ask
them how many times a week they think that movie is played in the
dorms. I’m sure if you went room to room you could find at least one
person watching it every night. It’s the kind of movie that only gets
funnier and funnier every time you watch it. There’s a million little
things Jeff does that are just hilarious.
Also, in what I think is a true stroke of Genius, the narrator (who,
in regular film noir is usually the protagonist), is Sam Elliot (go
look him up on imdb.com), who is somewhat reminiscent of the Marlboro
Man.
The Big Lebowski is the Cohen Brothers Legally Blonde, while Fargo is
their Taxi Driver.
I’ll mention briefly of course that O Brother Where Art Thou? is a
great adaptation of the Odyssey, but I think that this comparison
rates an entire email rant.
And there are a few that I haven’t seen: Barton Fink and Blood Simple
to name a few.
But I must build anticipation for what, in my opinion, should be the
next great Cohen Brothers film. They are in the middle of shooting
(for Paramount Pictures) a movie based on the book by Cormac
MacCarthy, No Country for Old Men. It’s a great book and I must say
that I can’t think of anyone more perfect for this movie than the
Cohen Brothers.
Not only does it have the kind of Fargo feel where ordinary people are
trying to live ordinary lives, but it involves quite a manhunt in a
very Big Lebowski type scenario. I can think of nothing more perfect
than the Cohen Brothers making a movie that will, hopefully, combine
the best elements of two of their best movies.
Also, this film, like all the Cohen Brothers movies, has excellent
casting choices. In fact, I’m going to make a bold statement and say
that casting is where the Cohen Brothers excel the most. Sure, they
write amazing scripts, and the composition of thier frames is
stunningly beautiful (especially in Fargo), but where the Cohen
Brothers succeed in every single one of their films is in the fact
that they cast the right people. They cast actors who know a role and
are comfortable in their ability to act so they all fully fill out
thier roles.
So here’s to you Joel and Ethan Cohen. Thank you for redefining the
genres we already know so well, and here’s to creating new ones.
-
Recent
-
Links
-
Archives
- November 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (2)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (5)
-
Categories
- Alcoholism
- Awards Shows
- Blogroll
- Books
- Brits
- Cameron Crowe
- Christmas
- Coen Brothers
- Comedy
- Comics
- Computers
- Culture
- Education
- Environment
- Friends
- Gay/Lesbian
- Grey's Anatomy
- Harry Potter
- High School
- Hollywood
- internet
- James Bond
- John Hughes
- Las Vegas
- Literature
- Los Angeles
- Movie Reviews
- Movies
- Music
- Musicals
- My So-Called Life
- Oprah Winfrey
- Oscars
- Parties
- Politics
- Porn
- Quentin Tarantino
- Rent
- Ron Jeremy
- San Francisco
- Santa Cruz
- Sex
- Sex and the City
- Steven Spielberg
- Stories
- Studio 60
- Television
- The Big Lebowski
- Uncategorized
- Veronica Mars
- Wicked
- Work
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS